|  |   Hippolyte Bayward, Le Noyé (self-portrait as a drowned man),
 18 October 1840, direct positive
 print, Société Française de
 Photographie, Paris (#24.269)
       | Studies based on
        the notion of a clear historical period always rest on
        dubious grounds. Attempts at locating beginnings usually
        result in foundational stories that have more to do with
        our own time's ruminations than with the ideas of those
        who contributed to mark a fresh turn in history. It seems
        plausible, however, to locate the beginnings of what
        could well be the single most influential force to have
        shaped contemporary everyday life aesthetics. I am
        referring to photography, an artifice whose beginnings
        coincide with those of modernity. Such has been the
        expansion of photographic technology over the past two
        hundred years that today we could be excused for failing
        to see it: it's all around us. Geoffrey Batchen¹s Burning
        With Desire: The Conception of Photography surveys
        the four decades prior to the medium's official birth in
        1839. Batchen identifies a "desire to
        photograph", which begins to take hold of some
        curious minds around the 1790s. The ensuing three decades
        were a period of extensive experimentation, which
        culminated with photography's official unveiling before
        the Parisian elites. Batchen documents this period
        carefully, down to the anecdotal detail, making Burning
        with Desire an interesting as well as enjoyable read. Batchen's research shows that the writing of light on
        chemically sensitive surfaces did not begin as a mere
        French curiosity. Due credit is given to at least twenty
        'proto-photographers' in seven countries for setting up
        the discursive framework that today allows us to conceive
        of photography. Both the timing and the ubiquity of these
        experiments suggest that photography was part of a larger
        historical unfolding. Batchen presents the early desire
        to photograph in the light of Foucault¹s historical
        understanding of the epistemological rupture that marked
        the transition from the Classical age to modernity. Although Foucauldian studies of the photographic image
        have already been rehearsed by the likes of John Tag and
        more recently Jonathan Crary, Batchen remains concerned
        about the methodological impasse that such critiques have
        inadvertently posed: the project of emptying photography,
        as a medium, from any formal quality of its own, has
        ended up invalidating the very notion of photography.
        Indeed, the prevailing view in Anglo-american postmodern
        criticism defines photography as nothing but an
        instrument of power. Such an instrumental view rests on
        the idealist premise that operations of power somehow
        precede photography. Batchen combines Foucault and Derrida to argue that
        photography, like writing, is more than an
        inconsequential medium. Photography is, by definition,
        the writing of light. It is a paradox, a "message
        without a code" in which both nature and culture are
        directly implicated in a mutual play of power dynamics.
        Batchen advances the notion of "photopower" to
        reinvest photography with the value it lost to positivist
        aesthetics.  As photography now begins to recede, clearing the way
        for the digitisation of communication technologies,
        Batchen revisits those early days when the new medium was
        still accepted as an unresolved phenomenon. Burning
        With Desire shows that the initial questions posed by
        the discovery of photography are yet to be resolved. Or
        are they? The writing of light keeps playing hide and
        seek with reason. This is where one may begin to
        appreciate the real breadth of Batchen's project: In
        showing that photography is more than an inert instrument
        of power, his study may be put to work as a model for a
        metacritique of postmodern strategies; as a warning
        against the consequences of assuming necessary and
        sufficient answers. Jorge Lopez1998
 © except images
 
 | 
    
        |  |  
 William
        Henry Fox Talbot, Botanical Specimen, c. 1835, photographic
 drawing negative, Science and
 Society Picture, Science Museum,
 London.
 | 
    
        |  |  
 Louis
        Daguerre, Still Life, 1837, daguerreotype, Société
 Française de Photographie, Paris.
 | 
    
        |  |  Jurraien Andriessen, Artist
        witha Camera Obscura, c. 1810,
 pen and ink wash drawing,
 Koninlkijk Oudheidkundig
 Genootschap (Rijksmuseum),
 Amsterdam.
 |